Tuesday, September 29, 2026
The Daily Signal
World news, clustered and summarised by machine
Edition of 29-09-2026 Final edition
Trends this edition
The Second Trump Era Reshapes the World 2Ukraine War’s Fragile Ceasefires and Escalation 9Middle East Security Realignment and Escalation 8Rising Anti-Migrant Activism in Britain 6Iranian Crisis Drives Regional Diplomatic Turbulence 5U.S.-Brazil Tensions Spread Across Trade and Travel 4
All →

U.S. Withdrawal Reshapes Iraq’s Security Landscape

Tuesday, September 29, 2026
Part of: U.S. Withdrawal Reshapes Iraq’s Security Balance (2 clusters · 29-09-2026 → 30-09-2026) →
Sources cbc.ca 1dw.com 1scmp.com 1
Image for cluster 20
Image source

cbc.ca

Two U.S. Army soldiers in camouflage uniforms stand with rifles in front of a building whose sign identifies an air force base in English and Arabic; an Iraqi flag and a uniformed man are also visible. Red-and-white barrier tape lines the walkway, with other uniformed personnel and aircraft murals in the background.

Summary

The United States is completing the withdrawal of its remaining forces from Iraq under an agreement reached in 2024, ending a military presence that began with the 2003 invasion and resumed in 2014 to support the fight against Islamic State. The departure is being celebrated by Iran and Iran-aligned groups as a victory and a step toward Iraqi sovereignty, but Iraqi officials and analysts warn it could expand Tehran’s influence, leave security gaps, and create opportunities for Islamic State sleeper cells to regroup. The risks are compounded by Baghdad’s delayed effort to bring armed groups under state control: powerful Iran-backed militias have not committed to disarm, while political ties to those groups make reform difficult. Kurdish, Christian and Yazidi communities, as well as the Kurdistan Region, may face greater exposure to missile, drone and militia threats as U.S. personnel and air defenses leave. Iraq seeks to balance relations with Washington and Tehran, and U.S.-Iraqi ties may continue through economic cooperation and conventional defense, but the transition puts pressure on Baghdad to maintain security and sovereignty.

Key Points

  • The U.S. withdrawal concludes more than two decades of military involvement, including its return in 2014 to help Iraqi forces defeat Islamic State.
  • Iran and its allies portray the departure as a victory; analysts warn it could strengthen Tehran’s influence and give Iran-aligned militias more political and security leverage.
  • Islamic State sleeper cells remain a concern, and security officials warn that reduced coalition support could leave openings for renewed attacks.
  • Baghdad has postponed its militia-disarmament deadline, while powerful armed groups have not agreed to surrender their weapons, complicating efforts to consolidate state authority.
  • The Kurdistan Region and Kurdish, Christian and Yazidi communities may be more vulnerable as U.S. forces and air-defense systems leave, even as Iraq seeks continued economic and defense ties with Washington.

Articles in this Cluster

U.S. forces set to leave Iraq after first arriving in 2003 | CBC News

U.S. forces are expected to leave their remaining bases in Iraq by Wednesday, ending a military presence that began with the 2003 invasion and resumed in 2014 to help defeat Islamic State. The withdrawal was agreed to in 2024 under President Joe Biden and is being completed by Donald Trump’s administration. About 4,500 Americans died during more than two decades of war in Iraq, and seven U.S. service members were among 18 listed as killed in the current war against Iran. Iran and Iran-backed groups have hailed the departure as a victory. Abu Mojtaba al-Yasiri, a commander in the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, called it a defeat for the American project. Iranian officials also say the withdrawal will bring lasting security. But Iraqi security experts and officials warn that leaving could increase Tehran’s influence, create security gaps, and allow Islamic State fighters to regain strength. Abdulrahman al-Zobaie, a Sunni tribal leader from Fallujah, said Iraqis want sovereignty but fear a vacuum if the U.S.-led coalition leaves before the country is ready. The article traces the U.S. military’s history in Iraq: the 2003 invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein, the first withdrawal in 2011, and the return to help Iraqi forces fight Islamic State from 2014 to 2017. Iraq has maintained ties with both Washington and Tehran, at times becoming a proxy battleground. The U.S. killed Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad in 2020, while Iran-aligned groups have repeatedly attacked U.S. bases. The departure comes amid a wider war involving Iran and attacks attributed by Washington to Iran-backed Iraqi militias, including a recent strike on a Saudi oil pipeline. Iraqi officials say they are trying to contain militia influence. Meanwhile, security officials say Islamic State retains sleeper cells, and a suspected cell was reportedly preparing suicide attacks to coincide with the U.S. pullout. The article presents the withdrawal as a popular step toward Iraqi sovereignty, but one carrying significant risks for regional influence and security.
Entities: Iraq, United States, Iran, Islamic State (ISIS), Islamic Resistance in Iraq • Tone: analytical • Sentiment: negative • Intent: analyze

Iraq: US troops exit as Baghdad delays militia disarmament

The United States is scheduled to complete the withdrawal of its remaining 2,500 troops from Iraq by September 30, 2026, ending its 12-year participation in Operation Inherent Resolve against ISIS and a period of more than two decades of US military involvement in the country. Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi has described October 1 as a milestone for national sovereignty, with public holidays planned to mark the occasion. The withdrawal follows a 2024 agreement and a broader US effort to reduce its military presence in the Middle East, though Turkey still maintains forces in Iraq. The departure does not resolve the challenge of bringing Iraq’s armed groups under state control. Baghdad has extended its disarmament deadline to June 30, 2027, proposing a period without attacks followed by a gradual handover of weapons. However, powerful Iran-backed groups, including Kata'ib Hezbollah, Harakat al-Nujaba and Kata'ib Sayyid al-Shuhada, have not indicated they will disarm. Analysts say Iraq’s fragmented politics and the connections between political movements and armed organizations make rapid security-sector reform unlikely. The withdrawal also raises concerns about the security of Iraq’s minorities and the Kurdistan Region. US personnel and air-defense systems are leaving Erbil, which has faced attacks involving Iran and Iran-backed Iraqi militias. Kurdish officials have sought protection from missile and drone threats, while attacks on Iranian Kurdish opposition groups in Iraq have also increased. Analysts warn that Kurdish, Christian and Yazidi communities may become more exposed to threats. At the same time, observers say US-Iraqi relations are expected to continue, with greater emphasis on economic ties and a more conventional defense relationship, provided Iraq can offer a secure environment.
Entities: Iraq, United States, Ali al-Zaidi, Operation Inherent Resolve, Islamic State (ISIS) • Tone: analytical • Sentiment: neutral • Intent: analyze

US forces set to complete withdrawal from Iraq after 2 decades | South China Morning Post

The article reports that US forces are expected to leave their last bases in Iraq by Wednesday, ending a military presence that has lasted more than two decades. The departure follows an agreement reached in 2024 under President Joe Biden and is being carried out by the administration of Donald Trump, despite the United States’ ongoing war against Iran. The article notes that about 4,500 Americans died during the years of conflict in Iraq. The withdrawal is being celebrated as a victory by Iran and its allies, who already hold significant influence in Iraq. Iraqi security experts warn that the departure could strengthen Tehran’s position by removing a military counterweight to its influence. Jasim al-Bahadli, an Iraqi security analyst who studies armed Shiite groups aligned with Iran, says pro-Iranian militia groups may use the withdrawal to claim political momentum and seek greater sway over security and political decision-making. The article also raises the possibility that reduced US involvement could give Iran and its allies greater freedom of action, while creating an opening for other adversaries to re-emerge, including Islamic State. The excerpt frames the withdrawal as a consequential shift in Iraq’s security and political landscape, particularly given the ongoing US-Iran conflict. It does not provide further details about the withdrawal timetable, the size of remaining forces, or the views of US or Iraqi officials.
Entities: United States, Iraq, Iran, Tehran, Donald Trump • Tone: analytical • Sentiment: negative • Intent: inform