20-05-2025

Trump-era immigration crackdowns face legal battles

Date: 20-05-2025
Sources: bbc.com: 1 | nytimes.com: 3 | theguardian.com: 2
Image for cluster 3
Image Source:

Source: nytimes.com

Image content: The image shows a group of people standing in a formal room with an American flag and a large portrait on the wall behind them. Several individuals appear to be press or staff holding recording equipment, while two people in the center stand attentively as if at a briefing or announcement.

Summary

A series of Trump administration moves to restrict immigration protections has triggered sweeping legal and political clashes. The Supreme Court allowed the early termination of Temporary Protected Status for roughly 350,000 Venezuelans, while additional efforts target TPS for other nationalities, humanitarian parole programs, and refugee admissions. Controversy intensified over constitutional limits after officials suggested suspending habeas corpus to streamline deportations—an assertion widely rejected by legal experts who note only Congress can suspend it in extreme circumstances. Meanwhile, reporting challenges claims about deportees’ legality and gang affiliations, and a separate dispute erupted over selective refugee admissions favoring white South Africans, fueling accusations of racial bias. Ongoing litigation and policy shifts leave hundreds of thousands of migrants in uncertainty and raise profound questions about executive power, due process, and humanitarian commitments.

Key Points

  • Supreme Court cleared early end to TPS for Venezuelans, affecting about 350,000 people.
  • Administration pursues broader rollbacks, including TPS for other groups, humanitarian parole, and refugee admissions.
  • Officials’ talk of suspending habeas corpus faces strong legal consensus that only Congress can do so.
  • Reports indicate some deportees entered the U.S. legally, challenging claims about undocumented status and gang ties.
  • Political backlash over admitting white South African refugees highlights alleged racial bias in asylum policy.

Articles in this Cluster

Supreme Court lets Trump end deportation protections for VenezuelansBritish Broadcasting CorporationBritish Broadcasting Corporation

The US Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and work permits for about 350,000 Venezuelans, lifting a California court order that had kept protections in place. The administration plans to terminate TPS for Venezuelans in April 2025, earlier than the original October 2026 end date. The emergency ruling came without a detailed opinion, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted as dissenting. Advocates warn of significant humanitarian and economic impacts. The decision is part of a broader set of Trump-era immigration actions before the Court, including anticipated moves to revoke TPS for Haitians and efforts—partly rebuffed—to use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act and to end humanitarian parole programs for certain nationalities.
Entities: US Supreme Court, Donald Trump, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), Venezuelans, Justice Ketanji Brown JacksonTone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: inform

Kristi Noem Incorrectly Defines Habeas Corpus as Trump’s Right to Deport People - The New York Timesbars

At a Senate hearing, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem incorrectly defined habeas corpus as a presidential “right” to deport people, prompting immediate correction from senators who noted it is a legal protection allowing detainees to challenge their detention. Noem suggested President Trump could suspend habeas corpus amid mass deportation efforts, echoing the administration’s broad view of executive power. Legal consensus holds that only Congress can suspend habeas corpus, as outlined in Article I and historically done rarely, typically with congressional authorization. Pressed on constitutional details, Noem acknowledged uncertainty about the source of suspension authority.
Entities: Kristi Noem, Habeas corpus, Donald Trump, U.S. Senate, Department of Homeland SecurityTone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: inform

Trump Canceled Deportation Protections. Here’s Where Legal Challenges Stand. - The New York Times

President Trump has moved to end multiple immigration protections, triggering a wave of lawsuits. The Supreme Court has temporarily allowed the administration to lift Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for about 350,000 Venezuelans, while a separate emergency request seeks to revoke humanitarian parole for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans in Noem v. Doe—also affecting Ukrainians and Afghans admitted under Biden-era programs. In Trump v. CASA, advocates challenge ending TPS for Afghans (May 20) and Cameroonians (June 7), arguing DHS must follow Congress’s required process; DHS has agreed to a slower, procedurally compliant timeline. A New York case, Haitian Evangelical Clergy Association v. Trump, seeks to block the suspension of TPS for Haitians, citing extreme instability and arguing the Venezuelan ruling doesn’t control their claims. Separately, Pacito v. Trump contests the suspension of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program. After mixed rulings, a judge ordered case-by-case consideration and immediate processing and resettlement services for 160 refugees with imminent travel plans. Overall, litigation is ongoing across multiple programs, leaving hundreds of thousands in limbo.
Entities: Temporary Protected Status (TPS), Supreme Court of the United States, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Noem v. Doe, Trump v. CASATone: analyticalSentiment: neutralIntent: inform

What Is Habeas Corpus, and Why Are Trump Officials Talking About Suspending It? - The New York Timesbars

The article explains habeas corpus, a constitutional safeguard that lets courts review detentions to prevent unlawful imprisonment. It clarifies that only Congress—not the president—can suspend habeas corpus, and only in cases of rebellion or invasion. Despite Trump officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, suggesting the president could suspend it or use it to justify deportations, legal experts dispute this. The administration has floated suspending habeas corpus for detained migrants by labeling illegal immigration an “invasion,” an argument repeatedly rejected by federal courts. The Supreme Court has held that immigrants can challenge deportations via habeas petitions, making the right essential in immigration cases. Historically, federal suspensions occurred during the Civil War, Reconstruction (against the KKK), in the Philippines (1905), and in Hawaii after Pearl Harbor.
Entities: habeas corpus, U.S. Congress, Donald Trump administration, Department of Homeland Security, Kristi NoemTone: analyticalSentiment: neutralIntent: inform

At least 50 migrants sent to El Salvador prison entered US legally, report finds | US immigration | The Guardian

A Cato Institute review found that at least 50 of the Venezuelan men the Trump administration deported to El Salvador’s Cecot prison had entered the U.S. legally—via ports of entry, parole, refugee resettlement, or visas—contradicting claims that only undocumented migrants were sent. The analysis, based on partial records for 174 of over 200 deportees, also questions gang allegations that often rely on non-gang-related tattoos. The deportations used the wartime Alien Enemies Act and have drawn scrutiny amid a broader U.S. immigration crackdown, including a Supreme Court ruling allowing the administration to revoke Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans, potentially affecting about 350,000 people.
Entities: Cato Institute, Venezuelan migrants, El Salvador's Cecot prison, Trump administration, Alien Enemies ActTone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: inform

Rubio clashes with Democrats over decision to admit white South Africans | Marco Rubio | The Guardian

Senator Tim Kaine sharply criticized Secretary of State Marco Rubio for admitting 59 white Afrikaners from South Africa as refugees while other refugee programs remain suspended, arguing the move reflects racial favoritism and undermines the asylum system. Rubio defended the decision, saying the applicants met legal criteria and that U.S. admissions can prioritize national interests, not strict even-handedness. Democrats, including Chris Van Hollen, accused the administration of turning refugee policy into “global apartheid,” contrasting the special designation for Afrikaners with the lack of similar programs for heavily persecuted groups like Uyghurs and Rohingya and the absence of such protections for Black South Africans during apartheid. The clash comes ahead of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa’s visit to the White House, amid broader disputes over claims of persecution of white farmers.
Entities: Marco Rubio, Tim Kaine, Chris Van Hollen, white Afrikaners, South AfricaTone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: critique