Pillay Wins Nobel as Trump Attacks Award and ICC

US President Donald Trump has criticised the Nobel Peace Prize decision after former International Criminal Court judge Navi Pillay received the award. Speaking at a rally in Syracuse, New York, hours after the announcement, Trump called the decision “disgraceful and embarrassing”, said he had never heard of Pillay, and described it as an “indelible stain” on Norway. He also claimed the prize had been discredited by “radical ideologues” and repeated his assertion that he had settled eight wars and was close to settling or winning two more, without providing evidence. Pillay, a South African former UN human rights chief and International Court of Justice judge, was recognised for promoting peace and international law. The Norwegian Nobel Committee said her work helped advance a more comprehensive global legal order and was instrumental in ensuring that war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide are prosecuted. Reacting to the news at Nuremberg’s Palace of Justice, the 85-year-old joked that she might share the prize with Trump if the audience applauded more. The article places Trump’s remarks in the context of his repeated public desire to receive the prize. He made similar complaints in 2025, when Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado won. Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre had previously explained that the award is decided by an independent committee based in Norway, rather than by the Norwegian government. The White House also criticised the committee last year, accusing it of putting politics over peace. In January, Machado presented her medal to Trump at the White House, saying it recognised his commitment to Venezuela’s freedom. Trump called the gesture one of mutual respect, but the Nobel committee clarified that the award cannot be revoked, shared or transferred and that its decision is final.

Navi Pillay, the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize laureate and former judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC), has condemned US sanctions against the court as “unheard of” and “unacceptable.” Pillay received the prize for her work promoting peace and international law. Speaking by video at an event in Oslo, she said sanctions targeting judges for their judicial orders threaten the continued existence of international courts. The Trump administration announced sweeping measures against the ICC shortly after President Donald Trump criticized the Nobel committee’s choice. The sanctions prohibit US entities from conducting transactions with the court and are intended to restrict its ability to operate financially. Washington says the measures defend US sovereignty and objects to the ICC’s pursuit of Americans. The administration has cited a now-closed investigation into US soldiers’ actions in Afghanistan and arrest warrants for Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The sanctions do not explicitly require the warrants to be withdrawn before they can be lifted. Some measures have a six-month grace period, which the US says will allow countries to negotiate a solution to its concerns. The ICC described the sanctions as an assault on the rule of law. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres called the decision a serious blow to international criminal justice, while the UK and several other countries said they regretted and strongly disagreed with it. The United States had already sanctioned 17 ICC judges and officials; the latest action targets the court as an institution. Pillay, 85, previously served as the UN human rights chief and worked on allegations of human rights violations in places including Rwanda, Myanmar and Gaza. Earlier in her career, she defended anti-apartheid activists in South Africa. She is the country’s fifth Nobel Peace Prize winner. Trump called her selection disgraceful and embarrassing, and has previously indicated that he believed he deserved the award.

The article reports that US President Donald Trump criticized the decision to award the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize to South African jurist Navanethem “Navi” Pillay. In a lengthy Truth Social post, Trump called the decision an “indelible stain on Norway,” said he did not know who Pillay was, and claimed that she was known mainly for opposing Israel. He argued that he deserved eight Nobel Peace Prizes because he had “settled 8 wars,” listing conflicts involving Cambodia and Thailand, Kosovo and Serbia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, Pakistan and India, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, and Israel and Hamas. He also said he expected to settle or win two more, citing Iran and Ukraine. Trump described the Nobel committee as discredited and Pillay as a liberal United Nations figure, and had criticized the award earlier at a campaign rally in Syracuse, New York. The article contrasts Trump’s remarks with Pillay’s professional record. Born in Durban, she worked as a defence attorney for anti-apartheid activists, served as an acting judge on South Africa’s High Court, and held judicial roles at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court. She was UN High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2008 to 2014. In 2025, as chair of a UN commission of inquiry on the occupied Palestinian territory and Israel, she accused Israel of genocide in Gaza. Upon learning she had won the Nobel, Pillay joked that she might share the prize with Trump if the audience applauded more. The report also notes that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced sanctions against the International Criminal Court. Rubio said Washington would prohibit transactions with the court, which the United States accuses of politicized actions and targeting Israel, and rejected the court’s jurisdiction over the US and its citizens.

The article reports that President Donald Trump again criticized the Norwegian Nobel Committee after it awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to South African jurist Navi Pillay rather than to him. In a Truth Social post, Trump claimed he had “settled 8 Wars” and was close to resolving two more, arguing that his record deserved recognition. He cited the US operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, efforts to secure the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas, and US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. He also claimed to have prevented Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and described the events in Venezuela as a war he had won. Maduro is facing narco-terrorism charges in New York. Trump also attacked the prize decision during an appearance in Syracuse on Friday. He called Pillay a person few people knew and described the award as a “stain” on Norway, saying the prize had been “forever discredited.” The article identifies Pillay as a former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, a former judge on the International Criminal Court, and a contributor to a UN report that found Israel committed genocide in Gaza. The story places Trump’s criticism alongside the US government’s stance toward the ICC: Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced sanctions against the court on Friday, calling it a “rogue court” and asserting that the US and its military personnel are not subject to its jurisdiction. The article also notes Trump’s statement that the US would not attack Iran before the next month’s midterm elections. It presents his claims and remarks as part of his continuing objection to being passed over for the peace prize.

US President Donald Trump renewed his criticism of the Nobel Peace Prize decision after the award went to South African judge and human rights lawyer Navi Pillay. Speaking at a rally in Syracuse, New York, Trump said the United States, represented by him, should have received the prize. He described the decision as disgraceful and embarrassing and said it had left a stain on Norway, which hosts the Nobel committee. He also claimed the decision was another example of Norway and others taking advantage of the United States. Trump’s remarks followed the Nobel committee’s announcement that Pillay had won the prize. Pillay is an ad hoc judge at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. She previously chaired a United Nations commission that investigated Israel’s retaliatory war in Gaza. The commission concluded that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration had committed genocide against Palestinians; the Israeli government firmly rejected that finding. Pillay has also served as an appeals judge at the International Criminal Court. At the rally, Trump disparaged Pillay as a “mystery person” and a liberal working at the United Nations, saying that neither he nor, in his view, the public knew who she was. He nevertheless ended his comments by offering congratulations. The article reports Trump’s reaction and outlines Pillay’s relevant roles and the disputed commission finding, without providing further explanation from the Nobel committee or a response from Pillay.

US President Donald Trump renewed his criticism of the Nobel Peace Prize after the 2026 award went to Navi Pillay, a former International Criminal Court judge. Speaking at a campaign rally in Syracuse, New York, on Oct 9, Trump called the decision “disgraceful and embarrassing” and said it had left an “indelible stain” on Norway, where the Nobel committee is based. He described Pillay as a “mystery person” and said he had never heard of her. The article notes that Trump has expressed disappointment at not receiving the prize each year of his presidency. Pillay was awarded the prize after overseeing a United Nations report that concluded Israel had committed genocide in Gaza. Trump attacked the Nobel committee and said the prize had been “forever discredited” by what he called “radical ideologues” who were “anti-democracy” and “enemies of civilisation.” He also listed conflicts he claimed to have helped resolve or prevent, including tensions involving North and South Korea, Japan and North Korea, and China and Taiwan. The article says he provided no evidence for those claims. The report presents Trump’s remarks in the context of the award announcement and his repeated frustration at being passed over. It also notes that the Nobel Peace Prize decision came hours before his comments. The article does not independently assess his claims about preventing conflicts; it reports that he made them without offering supporting evidence.

France 24 reports that Navanethem “Navi” Pillay won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday in Oslo, Norway. The article identifies Pillay as a former United Nations human rights chief and a judge at the International Court of Justice. Its brief description establishes the central news: the award went to Pillay, who has held senior roles in international human rights work and international justice. The page labels the item as a video and gives an issue time of October 10, 2026, at 11:25, but the supplied text contains no video transcript or further explanation of the Nobel committee’s decision. It does not describe the award ceremony, quote Pillay, discuss her career in detail, or name other people involved. Accordingly, the available article supports only a concise account of the announcement and Pillay’s stated positions; it does not provide enough information to assess the prize’s rationale or broader reactions. Related headlines and website notices in the supplied content are not part of the article itself.