Trump's National Guard Deployment Powers Limited

The article discusses the controversy surrounding Donald Trump's potential deployment of the National Guard without a governor's consent. Historically, presidents have federalized Guard troops without consent only five times, but Trump is considering doing so to protect federal personnel from protests against his policies. The Supreme Court is likely to rule on this matter, potentially limiting Trump's authority. The article highlights the changing dynamics of National Guard deployment and the checks on presidential power.

The article discusses how Donald Trump has maximized his power during his second term as President of the United States. It highlights that the Supreme Court has taken away his control over the National Guard, limiting his options for deploying troops. The article also touches on other topics such as the economics of megachurches, Trump's stance on Brutalism, and the internal conflicts within the Republican Party. Additionally, it mentions the growing trend of schools adopting a four-day week. The overall tone is analytical, and the sentiment is neutral with a hint of criticism towards Trump's actions. The primary intent is to inform readers about the current political landscape and Trump's strategies.

The Supreme Court has dealt a significant defeat to President Donald Trump by ruling that he cannot deploy National Guard troops in Chicago to manage protests against his immigration policy. The decision, made in the case Trump v Illinois, was a rare and consequential loss for the president. The ruling has limited Trump's options for sending in troops, making his remaining alternatives legally fraught. The decision was made on December 23rd, during the Christmas season, in an apparent attempt to minimize attention to the controversy.