US Strikes Iran Nuclear Sites, Escalating Tensions

Iran vowed to retaliate against the US after unprecedented air strikes on its nuclear facilities, with leaders threatening to target US bases in the Middle East. The US, led by President Donald Trump, claimed the strikes had destroyed Iran's nuclear program, although the extent of the damage was unclear. Iran's foreign minister and advisors to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued stern warnings, with one stating that any country hosting US forces would be considered a legitimate target. Protests erupted in Tehran as Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian vowed that the US would "receive a response." The strikes, carried out by seven B-2 Spirit bombers, targeted nuclear facilities in Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz, prompting concerns of a broader conflict in the region.

Iran is considering its next move after US airstrikes on its nuclear sites, with three possible courses of action: retaliating hard and soon against US interests, retaliating later when tensions have subsided, or not retaliating at all. Retaliating hard and soon could involve targeting US bases in the Middle East, using proxies in Iraq and Syria, or launching "swarm attacks" on US Navy warships. Retaliating later would mean launching a surprise attack when US bases are no longer on high alert. Not retaliating would require enormous restraint, but could lead to renewed US-Iran negotiations, which would require Iran to accept strict conditions, including giving up its nuclear enrichment programme. The decision will be driven by the survival of the Islamic Republic regime.

The BBC's security analyst Gordon Corera examines the damage caused by US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, with President Trump claiming the strikes took "the 'bomb' right out of their hands", while Iran's foreign minister said the country's nuclear knowledge "can't be destroyed by bombing".

The US and Iran are at a critical juncture after the US carried out direct military strikes on Tehran's nuclear sites, a move that has been described as unprecedented and potentially catastrophic. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, now faces a difficult decision on how to respond, as doing too little could damage his reputation, while doing too much could lead to devastating consequences. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Iran's military capabilities and regional proxies have been weakened by recent Israeli strikes. The international community, including European leaders, is calling for de-escalation and a return to diplomatic efforts to curb Iran's nuclear program. However, Iran views the US's diplomatic efforts as insincere, and is unlikely to return to negotiations while under attack. The next moves by both the US and Iran will be crucial in determining the outcome of the crisis.

Iran launched around 30 missiles at Israel, wounding at least 21 people, four seriously, after the US joined Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear sites. The missiles hit four locations across Israel, including Tel Aviv, where a building collapsed, trapping people under the rubble. Israel responded with fighter jet strikes in Iran, targeting missile and drone sites, including a strategic missile command center. The escalation is part of a week-long conflict between Israel and Iran, with the US now involved, resulting in significant damage and loss of life on both sides.

The US launched a military operation, dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer", against three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. Seven B-2 Spirit bombers flew from Missouri and dropped 14 "bunker-buster" bombs on Fordo and Natanz, while a US submarine launched Tomahawk cruise missiles at Isfahan. The operation involved over 125 US aircraft and 75 precision-guided weapons, and was described as the "largest B-2 operational strike in US history". The strikes inflicted "extremely severe damage and destruction" on the targets, with no US aircraft fired upon during the mission. The operation was carried out without Iran's air defenses detecting the US planes, and was deemed a "spectacular military success" by President Trump.

US Senator Marco Rubio stated that the US is ready to meet with Iran following the recent US bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites, and urged Iran to pursue diplomacy. Rubio warned that closing the Strait of Hormuz would be a "suicidal" move for Iran, as it would have significant global economic implications and potentially lead to severe consequences. He emphasized that the US has no current plans for further attacks on Iran unless it "messes around" and attacks US interests or personnel. Rubio also highlighted that the US is prepared to defend its people and bases in the Middle East from potential Iranian retaliation.

The US launched a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer," using seven B-2 Spirit bombers that dropped 14 "bunker-buster" bombs on Fordo and Natanz, while Tomahawk missiles targeted Isfahan. Satellite images show significant damage to the facilities, including craters on the ridge over the Fordo underground complex and blocked tunnel entrances. The images also show extensive building damage at Isfahan and a large crater at Natanz. The US used decoy B-2 bombers and other deception methods to carry out the strike without detection. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported no increase in off-site radiation levels, but warned that bombing nuclear facilities could result in radioactive releases with grave consequences.

The United States launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, President Trump announced on Saturday evening, calling them a "spectacular military success." The targeted facilities were Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, with the objective of destroying Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity. American B-2 Spirit bombers dropped "bunker-buster" bombs on Fordo, while submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeted Isfahan. The Pentagon confirmed that all three sites sustained "extremely severe damage and destruction." Iran has vowed to retaliate, firing around 30 missiles at Israel, and has condemned the U.S. strikes as "brutal military aggression." The international community has reacted, with Russia strongly condemning the U.S. attacks and the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency confirming no increase in off-site radiation levels. U.S. lawmakers have given a mixed response, with some Republicans supporting the strikes while others have expressed concerns.

The US carried out precision strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, which President Trump called a "spectacular military success." The strikes have escalated fears of a wider regional conflict. Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Netanyahu, praised the US strikes, while Iran vowed to retaliate, with its military warning of "regrettable responses." Iran's allies, Hamas and the Houthis, condemned the US strikes and pledged to join Iran's retaliation. The international community reacted with calls for diplomacy, with the UN Secretary General stating he was "gravely alarmed" and urging de-escalation. Russia condemned the US strikes as "irresponsible" and a violation of international law. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia expressed "deep concern" and called for restraint, while Lebanon's leader emphasized the need for his country to avoid being drawn into the conflict.

The Israel-Iran conflict escalated after the US launched airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites - Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan - using B-2 Spirit stealth bombers and submarines. This marked the first direct US action against Iran. The strikes followed Israel's preemptive attack on Iran on June 13, which killed key Iranian military figures and nuclear scientists. Iran condemned the US strikes as "outrageous" and vowed "everlasting consequences." Iran's parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil transit chokepoint, although the final decision lies with Iran's national security council. Oil prices rose over 2% following the news, and could potentially test $100 per barrel if Iran closes the Strait. The international community, including China, condemned the US strikes, and the UN Security Council met to discuss the situation. Iran has reserved all options for a response, and the world awaits its next move, which could impact oil prices and regional stability.

Iran's parliament has approved a plan to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for global oil exports, in response to a hypothetical US strike on Iranian nuclear sites. Experts, however, believe the likelihood of Iran following through is low, as it would harm the country's own economy and relationships with key trade partners, particularly China, which accounts for the majority of Iranian oil exports. A closure would risk alienating neighboring oil-producing countries and potentially lead to hostilities, causing significant disruptions to global oil supplies and driving up energy prices. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global oil exports, with around 20% of the world's oil passing through it. While Iran may use rhetoric around closing the strait, analysts believe the country is unlikely to take drastic action, instead potentially opting for a more nuanced approach to "rattle" oil flows and drive up prices without provoking a major US response.

Russia is watching as its ally Iran is pummeled by US airstrikes on its nuclear facilities. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is in Moscow for consultations with President Vladimir Putin. Analysts say Moscow may be unwilling or unable to help Iran due to its own needs in the Ukraine conflict and a desire to maintain good relations with the US under the Trump administration. Russia's response is being closely watched, with some analysts suggesting that the Iranian conflict could distract Western attention from Ukraine and potentially benefit Russia through higher oil prices, but also risking a weakening of its foothold in the Middle East and loss of investments in Iran.

A US airstrike, reportedly ordered by Donald Trump, has targeted three Iranian nuclear sites, sparking a significant escalation in the conflict between Iran and Israel. The attack's effectiveness and the potential for further retaliation or negotiation are uncertain, with Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, likely to remain resolute. The situation is further complicated by the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where deadly incidents are occurring almost daily.

Israel, led by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, has taken a bold and risky step in response to Iran's nuclear program, which poses an existential threat to the country due to its small size and proximity to Iranian missiles. For decades, Netanyahu has warned about the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran, and Israel's actions are a gamble aimed at preventing this outcome, which would significantly destabilize the region and put Israel's existence at risk.

The article discusses the recent conflict between the US and Iran, with Trump's airstrike aiming to "obliterate" Iran's nuclear program. The effectiveness of the strike is debated, and Israel's potential next move is considered. The conflict has caused mayhem in the Middle East, with Gaza in a "bloody limbo" and deadly shootings at aid-distribution sites. The article also touches on the humanitarian crisis in Sudan, the impact of high-tech warfare in Africa, and China's efforts to win over Africa in the global trade war by offering zero duties, contrasting with the US's tariffs on African goods.

Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, has achieved a long-held goal with the US, under Donald Trump's command, carrying out significant strikes on Iran's three main nuclear facilities, potentially "obliterating" its nuclear programme, although it remains uncertain whether the attacks have been truly decisive.

Donald Trump's task after US and Israeli forces struck Iranian nuclear sites is to prevent regional escalation and persuade Iran to abandon its nuclear ambitions, a challenging endeavor, as the region teeters on the brink of a potentially ruinous conflict, and the world would be safer if Iran abandoned its nuclear dreams.

US President Donald Trump carried out a significant air strike on Iran's Fordow nuclear facility using B-2 bombers and bunker-busting bombs, claiming to have "obliterated" the nuclear programme. The attack, long threatened by Trump and urged by Israel, follows Israel's declaration of war on Iran on June 13th, and has raised questions about the effectiveness of the strike and the potential responses from Iran and Israel.

The US launched "Operation Midnight Hammer", a large-scale strike on Iran involving over 125 military aircraft and dozens of Tomahawk cruise missiles, in an effort to destroy the country's nuclear program. The operation was ferocious, with the use of B-2 stealth bombers and GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs, but Iran's forces did not respond. The US defence secretary claimed that the strikes "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program, but it remains to be seen whether the operation has actually achieved its goals.

The Iran-Israel war is escalating and risks drawing in other countries, with Donald Trump's recent statement about bombing Iranian nuclear sites potentially exacerbating the situation; the article argues that Trump must offer Iran more than military action to prevent a wider inferno in the Middle East.

US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities may not halt the country's nuclear program as hard-line voices are calling for a nuclear weapon as a deterrent. Despite damage to facilities, Iran's technical know-how remains, and enrichment facilities can be rebuilt. Iranian officials are hinting at withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the whereabouts of manufactured nuclear material, including uranium-235 enriched to 60%, are unknown, raising concerns about a potential secret facility. The strikes may have increased the likelihood of Iran developing a nuclear bomb.

The conflict between Israel and Iran continues with both countries trading strikes, as the US has reportedly carried out military strikes against Iranian nuclear sites. President Donald Trump claimed that US bombers "obliterated" three Iranian nuclear sites. Iranian military officials and parliament members have vowed to retaliate, with one top commander warning that "we will never back down." Iran's foreign minister is meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. The strikes have caused a surge in oil futures, rising by around 10%, as investors fear Iran may disrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil checkpoint. Israel has identified additional missiles launched from Iran and is working to intercept them, with air raid sirens sounding in northern Israel. Iran has also fired missiles at Israel, causing some communities to lose power. The international community, including China, is calling for de-escalation to prevent further impact on the global economy. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has yet to respond to the US strikes.

President Donald Trump's recent strikes on Iran's nuclear plants have sparked debate over their true impact and the potential consequences. Trump claimed the damage was "monumental" and that the hits were "hard and accurate," but it's unclear whether the strikes truly destroyed Iran's nuclear ambitions. The US used B-2 stealth bombers and "bunker-busting" bombs, demonstrating its military potency, but questions remain about the extent of the damage. Iran's response is pending, and the Middle East is on alert for new turmoil. Trump's comments on social media raised the possibility of "regime change," which could have significant implications for the region. The situation is uncertain, and Iran's next move could lead to further escalation, potentially drawing the US into a full-scale war. The international community is waiting to see how Iran will respond, with options ranging from targeting US military bases to closing the Strait of Hormuz.

President Trump's order to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities raises constitutional and legal questions regarding the extent of presidential powers to conduct war without congressional approval. The administration relies on Article II of the Constitution, which grants the president authority to direct US military forces in engagements necessary to advance American national interests abroad. However, many legal experts and lawmakers disagree, citing the Constitution's statement that only Congress can declare war and the lack of congressional authorization. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 requires the president to consult with Congress before entering US troops into hostilities, but Trump did not do so. While previous administrations have sidestepped Congress for military actions, some lawmakers, including Republican Rep. Thomas Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, are seeking to reassert Congress' authority over military action. Ultimately, it is up to Congress to force the issue, potentially through a lawsuit or a war powers resolution, but leadership support is uncertain.

Hundreds of US citizens were evacuated from Iran over the past week ahead of US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, with some facing delays and harassment while trying to leave. The State Department reported that US citizens may face more difficulty exiting Iran than dual US-Iranian citizens, and warned against traveling to Iran due to risks of terrorism, civil unrest, and wrongful detention. The department advised Americans to use land routes via Azerbaijan, Armenia, or Turkey to leave Iran, as Iranian airspace was closed. Over 25,000 people received guidance from the State Department on how to leave Iran and Israel amid escalating tensions between the two countries.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog stated that Israel is not dragging the US into a war with Iran and that the US decision to attack Iranian nuclear sites was "the right step" due to the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program to American and global security. Herzog emphasized that now is the time for diplomacy, suggesting that any renewed talks with Iran must be clear and straightforward, given the history of failed negotiations. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also echoed Herzog's sentiments, stating that the US is "not at war" with Iran and that regime change is "not the goal," while still offering a diplomatic path forward.

New satellite images of Iran's Fordow nuclear facility show the aftermath of a US military strike as part of Operation Midnight Hammer. The US launched a surprise attack using B-2 stealth bombers on Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities. Joint Chiefs Chairman Air Force Gen. Dan Caine said all three sites sustained "extremely severe damage and destruction." The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed that off-site radiation levels have not increased following the strikes. The operation involved over 125 aircraft, including seven B-2 stealth bombers, and approximately 75 precision-guided munitions.

President Trump attempted to negotiate with Iran through Turkish President Erdoğan, offering to send high-ranking officials or meet with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian himself, but Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was unreachable and ultimately did not approve the meeting, leading to the US carrying out airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites.

US airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities may have set back Iran's nuclear program by up to a decade, according to Jacob Olidort, director of the Center for American Security. Iran may retaliate with "face-saving efforts" such as cyber-attacks or infrastructure attacks, but Olidort doesn't expect significant escalation due to Iran's diminished capabilities after recent Israeli strikes. Iran has already launched missiles at Israel, and while its proxies haven't immediately responded to the US strikes, Olidort notes this could indicate Iran's weakness. The full extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities is still being assessed.

The US struck three Iranian nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, with President Donald Trump claiming they were "totally obliterated." Israel's Ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, praised the US action, calling Iran's UN representative a "wolf disguised as a diplomat" and accusing Iran of hypocrisy. Iran's Ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, condemned the US strikes as "premeditated and unprovoked" and demanded an emergency Security Council meeting. UN Secretary-General António Guterres expressed alarm at the escalation, warning of catastrophic consequences. Iran retaliated with a missile attack on Israel, causing widespread destruction but no immediate fatalities.

Fighting intensified between Israel and Iran as they exchanged military strikes, including an Israeli strike on Iran's Fordo nuclear site. Sirens sounded in several areas across Israel after a barrage of missiles was launched from Iran, continuing the 11th day of war. Iran executed a man accused of spying for Israel, while Australia backed US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling for diplomacy to avoid a "full-scale war". US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China to help deter Iran from shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial trade route. North Korea condemned the US strikes, and former US President Donald Trump claimed the strikes inflicted "monumental damage" on Iran's nuclear program.

Iran is likely to retaliate against the US after a US-led attack on its nuclear facilities, with potential targets including US bases, warships, and diplomatic missions. Russia and China, Iran's allies, face a decision on how to respond, with Russia's foreign ministry condemning the US strikes as a "dangerous escalation". Iran's options include mining the Strait of Hormuz, targeting US allies' military assets, and launching missiles and drones at US forces, although its ability to do so has been degraded by Israeli strikes. The US attack targeted three Iranian nuclear facilities, including the Fordow nuclear fuel enrichment plant and the Natanz uranium enrichment facility.

Iraq is caught between its relationships with the US and Iran, with at least 2,500 American personnel stationed in the country, and is trying to avoid being dragged into the conflict between Israel, Iran, and the US. The Iraqi government, dominated by Shia Muslims, is close to Iran, and Shia militia groups in the country take guidance from Tehran. However, Iraq also relies on the US for stability and support against terrorist organizations like Islamic State. Iran-aligned militias in Iraq have vowed to attack American interests and personnel if the US joins Israel's war with Iran, which has already happened, and the US has warned that any attack on its assets would be "a very bad idea". Iraq's goal is to maintain a delicate balance between the two powers and resume diplomacy to avoid being drawn into the conflict.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has stated that stability in the Middle East is a priority following US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. He called on Iran to return to the negotiating table to reach a diplomatic solution to the crisis. The US, under Donald Trump, struck three Iranian sites, with Trump claiming the country's key nuclear sites were "completely and fully obliterated". The international community has reacted with concern, with the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressing alarm at the "dangerous escalation" and calling for diplomacy. World leaders, including EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, have urged restraint and a return to negotiations to prevent further escalation.

The US has launched strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, joining Israel's war against the country. Iran's response will determine the future of the region, with options ranging from a "like-for-like" retaliation against US bases to targeting oil facilities in the Gulf or the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranian government faces a difficult decision due to its weakened state, both internally and externally, and risks either a severe US response if it escalates or major domestic dissent if it capitulates. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is faced with "no good choices."

The US launched airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, citing the goal of preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. The operation, dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer," involved B-2 stealth bombers and Tomahawk missiles, resulting in significant damage to the targeted sites. Iran condemned the strikes as a "grave and unprecedented violation" of international law, warning of "dangerous consequences." The international community reacted with a mix of alarm, caution, and praise, while US politicians largely responded along party lines, with Republicans backing the move and many Democrats questioning its legality and constitutionality. The Trump administration is assessing the effectiveness of the strike, and President Trump hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran.

The US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities has significant political implications for President Trump, who campaigned on ending "forever wars." Five key takeaways from the strike include: Trump's action may be at odds with his "forever wars" pledge, and the response from his base is uncertain; the full impact of the attack is still unknown and will depend on evidence of its success; Iran's retaliation will have serious consequences; the strike raises questions about Trump's approach to foreign affairs and whether he was influenced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu; and the debate over congressional authorization for military action is unlikely to gain traction, with Republicans rallying around Trump and Democrats risking being seen as defending Iran.

The US airstrikes on Iran, known as Operation Midnight Hammer, have created an opportunity for a new era of peace in the Middle East. With Iran's nuclear threat neutralized and its proxies devastated, Arab nations can now pursue a more prosperous future. The Abraham Accords approach, which involves friendship with the US and Israel, has already shown success in enriching nations that have signed on. Arab leaders are poised to abandon failed approaches of the past, such as pan-Arabism, and instead build on the progress made through cooperation with the US and Israel, potentially leading to a more stable and peaceful region.

Iran has warned the US of "heavy consequences" after a US-led attack on its nuclear sites, with a spokesperson for Iran's military saying "Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it." The US launched 75 precision-guided munitions against three Iranian nuclear sites, causing significant damage, according to President Trump. Iran has retaliated with missile strikes against Israel, but has not yet targeted US bases or the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could escalate the conflict further and impact global oil prices, which have already jumped in response to the crisis.

Miranda Devine praises President Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities, calling it a "spectacular military success" and a "spectacular political calculation." The operation, code-named "Operation Midnight Hammer," involved B-2 stealth bombers dropping 14 "bunker buster" bombs on Iran's underground nuclear sites. Devine argues that Trump's bold move could carve his place in history as the most courageous leader since Ronald Reagan, potentially leading to peace in the Middle East and the extension of the Abraham Accords. She contrasts Trump's decisive action with the previous administration's weakness, citing the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan and the failed Iran deal. Devine also praises Trump's leadership style, comparing him to Winston Churchill, and notes that his approval ratings are likely to soar as a result of his strong stance.

President Trump decided to strike Iran's nuclear facilities after a series of chaotic events and internal debates within his administration. Initially, Trump had warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against striking Iran, but after Israel launched a series of precision strikes against Iran, Trump changed his stance and began to consider a US military intervention. Despite public statements suggesting he was undecided, Trump had largely made up his mind to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. To avoid telegraphing the attack, the US military employed a deception plan, including a diversionary tactic with B-2 bombers flying west over the Pacific Ocean, while the actual attack came from the east across the Atlantic. The operation, code-named "Midnight Hammer," involved seven B-2s refueling multiple times before bombing Fordo and Natanz, and a Navy submarine launching cruise missiles at Isfahan. Trump's decision was influenced by various factions within his administration and allies, including Stephen K. Bannon, who opposed a bombing campaign, and Tucker Carlson, who publicly denounced US involvement in a war with Iran.

Tensions escalated between the US, Iran, and Israel as the US carried out airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, prompting Iran to retaliate with missile strikes on Israel. Israeli civilians took shelter as their military launched further attacks on Iranian "military targets." US officials detected signs that Iran-backed militias were preparing to attack American bases in Iraq and Syria. Iran's Foreign Minister met with Russian President Putin, but Russia showed little sign of providing military assistance. The international community scrambled to prevent further violence, with EU foreign ministers discussing the situation and NATO set to address it at a summit. The strikes raised concerns about the global economy, with Asian markets dipping due to fears of potential economic fallout and Iran disrupting oil shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency warned of "unimaginable levels" of violence if diplomacy was not achieved, and offered to travel to Iran to help protect nuclear facilities. The US prepared for potential Iranian retaliation, including the possibility of Iran mining the Strait of Hormuz, which could cause oil and gas prices to soar.

Senior US officials, including Vice President JD Vance, have conceded that they are unsure of the fate of Iran's stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium following a recent air attack. The uranium, enough to make 9-10 atomic weapons, was stored in a nuclear complex near Isfahan. Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, indicated that the fuel had been moved, but its current location is unknown. The air attack, which targeted Iranian nuclear sites including Fordo and Natanz, caused significant damage but may not have completely destroyed Iran's nuclear capabilities. Satellite images suggest that Iran may have removed equipment and material from the sites before the attack. The Iranian government has refused to engage in conversations with the US, and it is unclear whether International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors will be allowed to resume inspections to verify the whereabouts and safety of the uranium stockpile.

China criticized the US and Israel for their conflict with Iran, calling for de-escalation and adherence to international law after a US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. China's UN ambassador, Fu Cong, stated that the US had violated Iranian sovereignty and exacerbated Middle East tensions, and urged the international community to work towards restoring peace and stability. The UN Security Council meeting saw divisions along geopolitical lines, with China and Russia defending Iran and the US and its allies defending Israel.

Escalating tensions between the US and Iran, triggered by US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, have raised concerns about the global economy. Analysts warn that Iran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial oil shipping route, could lead to higher crude prices, increased US inflation, and complicate the Federal Reserve's rate-cut plans. This could also lead to a rise in risk aversion, with gold likely to benefit from the geopolitical shock, while Chinese assets may remain relatively shielded.

The US killing of a top Iranian military leader five years ago led to a relatively subdued initial response from Iran, with missile strikes against US troops in Iraq that were less severe than expected. Analysts now warn that a weakened Iran may resort to assassination and terrorism in retaliation for future perceived provocations, as its conventional military capabilities are diminished.

Tensions escalated in the Middle East as the US struck three Iranian nuclear facilities, prompting fears of a wider war. Iran vowed to defend itself, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi saying "all options" are on the table. Israel and Iran continued to exchange fire, with Israel launching airstrikes on Iranian cities and Iran launching missiles towards Israel. President Donald Trump raised the prospect of regime change in Tehran, contradicting his top officials. The International Atomic Energy Agency is assessing the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran's Foreign Minister met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, seeking support amid the conflict. The situation remains volatile, with concerns of a larger conflict and potential consequences for the region.

Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018 derailed a deal that aimed to curb Iran's nuclear programme. Abbas Araghchi, an Iranian negotiator, had previously worked on the JCPOA in Geneva. Trump's subsequent attacks on Iran have not achieved their intended goal, and the Iranian regime remains inflexible, while Trump's unreliability complicates potential negotiations.

European leaders are preparing to meet President Donald Trump at a NATO summit in the Netherlands this week, but the gathering is now overshadowed by Trump's decision to order US bombers to join Israel's attack on Iran. The strike has escalated a conflict outside the euro-Atlantic sphere, potentially embroiling NATO nations and sparking new waves of refugees, disrupting global trade, and unleashing unpredictable consequences. European leaders, who were largely sidelined during Trump's decision-making process, will press him face-to-face to consider a wider escalation. Some European leaders, such as French President Emmanuel Macron, are calling for restraint and renewed diplomacy, while others, like British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, have voiced more support for Trump's actions. The NATO summit was carefully planned to address rifts between European capitals and Washington, but the US strike on Iran has thrown a wrench into the proceedings, testing NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's ability to maintain the alliance's focus on its core mission.

The US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, not Marco Rubio, has urged China to pressure Iran to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, a vital shipping route for global oil supplies. Iran's parliament has approved a plan to close the Strait, but the final decision rests with the Supreme National Security Council. China is the largest buyer of Iranian oil and has a close relationship with Tehran, making it a key player in influencing Iran's decision. The Strait is crucial for global oil supplies, with around 20% of the world's oil passing through it, and any disruption could send oil prices skyrocketing, affecting economies worldwide.

The Strait of Hormuz is a vital oil trade route connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea, with Iran controlling its northern side. It is a crucial chokepoint for global energy security, with over 20 million barrels of oil passing through it daily, accounting for about a quarter of global maritime oil trade. The strait is also a key route for liquefied natural gas, with about one-fifth of global trade passing through it. Iran has previously threatened to close the strait in response to Western pressure, and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned that such a move would be "suicidal" for Iran, as it would impact global energy markets and economies, particularly countries like China, India, and Japan that rely heavily on oil imports through the strait. The US has pledged to uphold freedom of navigation in the strait, with its 5th Fleet stationed in Bahrain.

The Strait of Hormuz is a strategically important waterway between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, through which around 20 million barrels of oil, one-fifth of daily global production, flow every day. The strait is only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point and is controlled by Iran on its northern side. Recent attacks on Iran by Israel and the US have raised fears that Iran could retaliate by disrupting shipping in the strait, causing oil prices to surge. Iran's geographic leverage over global shipping gives it the capacity to cause a shock in oil markets and drive up oil prices. A closure of the strait would be particularly detrimental to China and other Asian economies, which rely heavily on the crude oil and natural gas shipped through the waterway. While some experts see Iran's blocking of the strait as a remote risk, others warn that it could cause oil prices to surge toward $100 per barrel.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical waterway that handles around 20% of global oil and gas flows, with 84% of the crude oil and condensate and 83% of liquefied natural gas passing through it going to Asian markets, particularly China, India, Japan, and South Korea. Iran has threatened to block the strait amid rising tensions with the US and Israel, which could lead to a global energy and trade crisis, with China being particularly vulnerable as the world's largest oil importer, relying heavily on Middle Eastern oil supplies.

The US joining the war between Iran and Israel has increased uncertainty in oil markets, with experts warning of potential triple-digit prices. Oil prices jumped over 7% after Israel struck Iran, and futures were up over 2% with US WTI crude at $75.22 per barrel and Brent at $78.53 per barrel. Industry watchers predict an "oil price shock" similar to 2022 if the Strait of Hormuz is closed, which could propel crude prices to $100 per barrel. The strait is a critical artery for global oil trade, with 20 million barrels passing through it daily. Experts believe that even a partial disruption could lead to a significant price increase, although some note that threats to close the strait have been largely rhetorical in the past.

The U.S. dollar surged after U.S. military strikes on Iran due to its safe-haven status, with the dollar index up 0.45% at one point. However, analysts warn the gains may be short-lived as concerns over U.S. fiscal policy, trade wars, and weakening international demand for U.S. assets may regain focus once the immediate crisis-driven demand fades. Some analysts believe the Middle East conflict is masking these underlying concerns, and the dollar's long-term trend remains bearish, with the dollar index down over 8% this year.

US stock futures rose on Monday after the US launched air strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, escalating the Middle East conflict and causing oil prices to spike. Dow Jones futures rose 0.1%, S&P 500 futures added 0.3%, and Nasdaq-100 futures moved up 0.4%. Oil prices had surged after the US strikes, with WTI crude rising 0.4% to $74.15 per barrel. Defense stocks rose in premarket trade, with Northrop Grumman up 2.07% and Lockheed Martin up 1.13%. The S&P 500 had lost 0.15% the previous week, its second negative week in a row, amid concerns over the conflict's impact on the economy. Asia-Pacific markets mostly declined on Monday, with Japan's Nikkei 225 down 0.13% and Australia's S&P/ASX 200 down 0.36%.

The US carried out a complex operation, code-named "Operation Midnight Hammer", to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities using seven B-2 stealth bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles. The bombers took off from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri and flew over the Atlantic Ocean to avoid detection, while decoy flights were sent to Guam to distract from the real mission. The bombers were loaded with "bunker buster" bombs capable of penetrating deep into concrete and were supported by other aircraft that swept ahead to detect enemy fighters and surface-to-air missile threats. The US launched over two dozen Tomahawk missiles from a submarine in the Arabian Sea, targeting a nuclear site near Isfahan, while the B-2s dropped 14 "bunker buster" bombs on the Fordo and Natanz nuclear facilities. The operation took around 25 minutes to complete, with the bombers spending 18 hours in the air. The US claims to have "obliterated" Iran's nuclear regime, but the true extent of the damage is still unclear.

The US carried out a massive airstrike operation, code-named "Operation Midnight Hammer", against three key Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22, 2025. The operation involved seven B-2 stealth bombers, which flew 18 hours from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri to strike the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites. To maintain secrecy, a decoy flight was launched, with some B-2s flying west into the Pacific. The main strike force flew eastward with minimal communications, refueling multiple times en route. As they entered Iranian airspace, a US submarine launched over two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles to clear the way. The B-2s dropped 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker-busters on Fordow and Natanz, while the Tomahawks hit Isfahan. The operation involved over 125 aircraft and 75 precision-guided munitions. The mission was the largest B-2 operational strike in US history and demonstrated the US military's unmatched reach and capability. Iran's air defenses were reportedly caught off guard, with no shots fired at the US strike package.

This year's NATO summit is set to be overshadowed by recent U.S. military action in Iran, amid concerns about the alliance's future. The summit, being held in The Hague, Netherlands, comes as Europe is uncertain about the U.S.'s commitment to the alliance under President Donald Trump. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is pushing for European nations to increase defense spending, calling for a "quantum leap" in capabilities to shield against Russia. Experts say the war in Ukraine poses an existential threat to Europe, and that European countries must collectively commit to their own security and defense. The U.S.'s attention has been diverted by conflicts in the Middle East and Asia, leading some to speculate that the NATO alliance as it's been known for 75 years is finished.

NATO must increase its defense spending to deter Russia and keep the US engaged, as European members currently underinvest in defense, and a hard deadline is needed to boost their budgets.

The UK and its NATO allies have agreed to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, ahead of a major summit of leaders. The target, which is up from the current goal of 2%, is broken down into 3.5% for pure defence and 1.5% for related areas like infrastructure and cybersecurity. However, Spain's prime minister has indicated that his country may not comply with the new target, potentially causing friction with US President Donald Trump, who has warned that he will not defend member states that do not pay their fair share.

Asia-Pacific markets mostly declined on Monday after the US attacked three nuclear sites in Iran, raising oil prices and investors' fears of an escalation in the Middle East conflict. Japan's Nikkei 225 fell 0.13%, South Korea's Kospi index retreated 0.24%, and Australia's S&P/ASX 200 ended down 0.36%. In contrast, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index rose 0.67% and mainland China's CSI 300 index added 0.29%. Oil prices initially rose but later fell, with Brent Crude trading at $76.75 per barrel and West Texas Intermediate crude at $73.6. Travel-related stocks declined due to fears of supply disruption, while Asia-Pacific currencies weakened against the US dollar.

China remains optimistic about business opportunities in the Middle East despite escalating tensions between Iran and Israel. Chinese shipments to Dubai have risen 20% this month compared to last year, driven by demand for batteries and daily necessities. China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has called for a ceasefire and expressed concerns over US attacks on Iran. A stable Middle East is seen as serving China's economic and strategic interests, with Beijing positioning itself as a constructive power capable of contributing to global stability. Chinese businesses are likely to interact cautiously with Iran due to concerns over secondary sanctions, but a relaxation of US sanctions could lead to increased Chinese investment in Iran's tourism, real estate, and infrastructure.