21-06-2025

Trump and Newsom Clash Over National Guard Deployment

Date: 21-06-2025
Sources: nytimes.com: 2 | bbc.com: 1
Image for cluster 4
Image Source:

Source: nytimes.com

Image content: The image is a black-and-white photograph of a crowd of people, with one man prominently raising his fist. The man is standing in the center of the image, wearing a dark shirt and jeans, and has long dreadlocks; he appears to be leading or participating in a protest or demonstration, as evidenced by his raised fist and the surrounding crowd. The scene is likely a public gathering or rally, with a mix of serious and determined expressions on the faces of those present.

Summary

A legal battle between President Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom over the deployment of the California National Guard to Los Angeles has unfolded, with a federal appeals court ultimately ruling that Trump was likely within his authority to federalize the National Guard.

Key Points

  • Trump deployed around 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles despite Newsom's objections, citing the need to protect federal personnel and property during immigration raids
  • The appeals court ruled that Trump was likely within his authority to federalize the National Guard, but also established that courts have the power to review the president's determination
  • The deployment was part of a broader controversy surrounding Trump's immigration policies and his narrative of 'lawlessness' and 'invasion' by undocumented immigrants in cities like Los Angeles

Articles in this Cluster

Where Trump and Newsom’s Fight Over the California National Guard Stands - The New York Times

President Trump's decision to deploy the California National Guard to Los Angeles against Governor Gavin Newsom's wishes has sparked a legal battle over presidential authority. The Trump administration invoked a statute allowing the president to federalize a state militia when there is a rebellion against governmental authority, citing the need to protect immigration agents from protesters. California argued that the deployment was an abuse of presidential authority and that local law enforcement could handle the protests. A federal district court judge initially ruled in favor of California, ordering the return of the National Guard to state control, but an appeals court blocked this decision. The appeals court ultimately ruled that Trump was likely within his authority to federalize the National Guard, but also established that courts have the power to review the president's determination. California may appeal the decision or focus on its separate argument that federal troops should not be used for law enforcement duties.

US court allows Trump to keep control of National Guard in LABritish Broadcasting CorporationBritish Broadcasting Corporation

A US appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump can maintain control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles, despite objections from city leaders and California Governor Gavin Newsom, who argued the deployment was unnecessary and an overreach of Trump's authority. The court's decision allows the continued deployment of around 4,000 troops, who were sent to protect federal personnel and property during immigration raids. Trump hailed the ruling as a "big win," while Newsom said the court "rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard."

The Lessons of Trump’s Fight With Los Angeles Over Immigration - The New York Times

The Trump administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles led to protests and the deployment of federal forces, including Marines, to the city. Despite Trump's narrative of "lawlessness" and "invasion" by undocumented immigrants, the raids largely targeted individuals without criminal records. The protests, while intense, were largely contained by the Los Angeles Police Department, and the National Guard and Marines were limited in their role. Trump's actions were seen as a staged production, leveraging images of chaos to justify his policies and appeal to his base. California Governor Gavin Newsom described the situation as "Kabuki," highlighting the disconnect between the reality on the ground and Trump's narrative. The episode is likely to be a precursor to further confrontations between the Trump administration and Democratic-run cities over immigration and law enforcement.