21-05-2025

Judge Rebukes Third-Country Deportations

Date: 21-05-2025
Sources: bbc.com: 1 | edition.cnn.com: 1 | nytimes.com: 2 | theguardian.com: 2
Image for cluster 0
Image Source:

Source: edition.cnn.com

Image content: The image shows a grand white neoclassical building with columns and an American flag on top, set against a dramatic sky with dark storm clouds. Leafless trees and a manicured lawn surround the structure, and a few people are visible near the perimeter.

Summary

A federal judge in Boston warned and then ruled that the Trump administration violated a standing court order by deporting or attempting to deport detainees to third countries—allegedly including South Sudan—without adequate notice or meaningful opportunity to contest removal. The cases involved migrants from multiple nations with serious criminal histories, and featured opaque government actions, disputed “classified” destinations, and failures to provide interpreters and due-process protections. The court ordered migrants kept in U.S. custody, granted access to counsel, set minimum notice periods to challenge removals, and threatened officials with contempt for noncompliance. The controversy also spotlighted South Sudan’s fragile security and political crisis, heightening concerns over the risks of sending non-nationals to unstable countries under U.S. “do not travel” advisories.

Key Points

  • Judge Brian E. Murphy found the administration violated his due-process order by conducting third-country deportations with insufficient notice.
  • Migrants from Burma, Vietnam, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, and South Sudan were moved with opaque destinations; DHS at times withheld or disputed final locations.
  • Court mandated custody, counsel access, humane treatment, and at least 10–15 days’ notice to contest removals, warning of potential contempt.
  • Advocates allege a flight carried a dozen detainees to South Sudan; South Sudan denies receiving them and vowed to re-deport non-nationals.
  • The episode draws attention to South Sudan’s instability and safety risks, raising legal and humanitarian concerns over third-country removals.

Articles in this Cluster

Judge warns US deportations to South Sudan may breach court orderBritish Broadcasting CorporationBritish Broadcasting Corporation

A U.S. federal judge warned the Trump administration it may be in contempt for deporting migrants to South Sudan in possible violation of his order requiring a “meaningful opportunity” to challenge removal to third countries. Immigration lawyers said a flight with about a dozen people, including nationals of Myanmar and Vietnam, landed in South Sudan. The DOJ said one Burmese man was returned to Myanmar and declined to disclose the Vietnamese man’s destination, calling it classified; both men had serious criminal histories, according to government lawyers. The judge ordered the migrants kept in government custody and treated humanely pending a hearing, and cautioned that sending migrants to countries like Libya or South Sudan could breach his April injunction. The case underscores escalating clashes between federal courts and the administration over mass deportations and third-country removals.
Entities: U.S. federal judge, Trump administration, South Sudan, Department of Justice, MyanmarTone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: inform

Lawyers accuse Trump administration of deporting Vietnamese and Burmese migrants to South Sudan in violation of court order | CNN PoliticsClose icon

Attorneys for Vietnamese and Burmese migrants filed an emergency motion alleging the Trump administration deported at least a dozen detainees to South Sudan, violating a federal court order requiring written notice and a chance to contest removal to third countries. One Burmese client with limited English was reportedly flown from Port Isabel Detention Center without an interpreter or proper notice; a Vietnamese migrant and others were allegedly on the same flight. Judge Brian Murphy had previously barred such third-country deportations without due process. Lawyers seek the migrants’ return and an order halting further removals absent compliance. DHS has not confirmed the flights; South Sudan currently carries a U.S. “do not travel” advisory due to conflict.
Entities: Trump administration, Vietnamese migrants, Burmese migrants, South Sudan, Department of Homeland Security (DHS)Tone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: warn

Judge Finds Trump Administration Violated Court Order With Deportation Flight to South Sudan - The New York Times

A federal judge in Boston, Brian E. Murphy, ruled that the Trump administration violated his prior order by deporting eight men with barely 24 hours’ notice, despite a requirement to allow at least 15 days to contest removal to a third country. The deportees—citizens of Cuba, Laos, Mexico, South Sudan, Burma, and Vietnam with serious criminal convictions—were flown from Texas to Djibouti on a private jet, with DHS declining to disclose the final destination but saying it was not South Sudan. Murphy demanded a list of officials involved and warned they could face criminal contempt, while ordering that the men receive legal counsel and interviews to assert fear-of-harm claims, with a 15-day window to challenge adverse determinations and U.S.-arranged housing pending decisions. The case is one of several recent accusations that the administration has skirted the judge’s due-process order in deportations involving third countries.
Entities: Brian E. Murphy, Trump administration, Department of Homeland Security, South Sudan, DjiboutiTone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: inform

Judge Orders U.S. to Keep Custody of Migrants Amid Claims They Were Sent to South Sudan - The New York Times

A federal judge in Boston ordered the Trump administration to keep migrants in U.S. custody upon landing from a deportation flight that advocates said was headed to South Sudan, warning the government may be in contempt of his April injunction requiring 15 days’ notice before sending people to third countries. During a chaotic hearing, officials could not say where the plane was or its destination, citing disputed “classified” claims. One Burmese migrant was later said to have been sent to Myanmar, while the destination of a Vietnamese man was withheld. The ruling follows repeated clashes over due process as the administration pursues third-country removals, seeking deals to send noncitizens far from the U.S. A Wednesday hearing will examine whether the government violated the court’s order and migrants’ rights.
Entities: U.S. federal court in Boston, Trump administration, South Sudan, third-country removals, injunction requiring 15 days’ noticeTone: urgentSentiment: negativeIntent: inform

Judge rules White House violated order by deporting migrants to South Sudan | Trump administration | The Guardian

A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled the Trump administration violated a court order by deporting migrants to South Sudan and other third countries without adequate notice or due process. Eight people were apparently removed, most not South Sudanese, with shifting and unclear destinations. The judge criticized the government’s opaque process, noted potential grave risks to deportees, and warned against false statements to the court. He clarified that any third-country removals must include formal notice and at least 10 days for migrants to contest. Homeland Security defended the deportations as involving serious criminals but withheld final destinations, while South Sudan said no such migrants had arrived.
Entities: Trump administration, White House, South Sudan, Department of Homeland Security, federal judge in MassachusettsTone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: inform

US deportations cast spotlight on South Sudan’s deepening political crisis | South Sudan | The Guardian

A disputed US attempt to deport migrants to South Sudan has spotlighted the country’s escalating political turmoil. A federal judge ruled the move violated a court order on due process for third-country deportations. South Sudan denied receiving the migrants and vowed to re-deport any non-nationals. Meanwhile, the country faces deepening instability: Vice-president and opposition leader Riek Machar is under house arrest following clashes involving the White Army militia, straining the fragile peace deal that ended the 2013–2018 civil war. UN warnings of a relapse into widespread conflict coincide with ongoing government offensives in the northeast and President Salva Kiir’s elevation of Benjamin Bol Mel—seen as his chosen successor—within the ruling SPLM. Despite vast oil reserves, South Sudan remains underdeveloped, impoverished, and vulnerable to extreme flooding, exacerbating its crisis.
Entities: United States, South Sudan, Riek Machar, Salva Kiir, Benjamin Bol MelTone: analyticalSentiment: negativeIntent: inform